Three people will evaluate your autobiography: you, a classmate,
and your instructor. Each person will place their evaluation, based
on the criteria set, on the rubric below. All scores will be averaged
(large discrepancies will need to be discussed). Your final grade will
be recorded as a grade out of 50 points.
Critique for Projects
1. Utilizes scientific facts, concepts and principles in projects.
2. Demonstrates a solid grasp of the scientific facts, concepts and principles
relevant to the topic.
3. Spelling, grammar, and mechanics have been carefully edited.
4. Organization is clear and logical.
5. Appearence is neat and professional.
6. Appropriate technology is used to convey message, (computer, slides,
photos, models, etc.)
7. Product generates interest and appears to impact the intended audience.
8. Project shows creativity and originality.
9. Related to the concepts taught in the Periodicity Unit.
10. Meets the minimum and maximum word requirements.
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | ||
Superior | 10 | ||||||||||
Excellent | 9 | ||||||||||
Very Good | 8 | ||||||||||
Average | 7 | ||||||||||
Below Average | 6 | ||||||||||
Below Average | 5 | ||||||||||
Weak | 4 | ||||||||||
Very Weak | 3 | ||||||||||
Poorly Done | 2 | ||||||||||
Poorly Done | 1 |
Author Signature_________________________
Peer Signature___________________________ Grade______________
Comments: